水産科学ジャーナル.com

  • ジャーナル h-index: 30
  • 雑誌引用スコア: 25.50
  • ジャーナルのインパクトファクター: 21.90
インデックス付き
  • 学術雑誌データベース
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • グローバル インパクト ファクター (GIF)
  • 中国国家知識基盤 (CNKI)
  • サイテファクター
  • 電子ジャーナルライブラリ
  • 国際農業生物科学センター (CABI)
  • 研究ジャーナル索引作成ディレクトリ (DRJI)
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • プロクエスト召喚
  • パブロン
  • ミアル
  • Advanced Science Index
  • Google スカラー
  • 化学概要
  • シェルパ・ロメオ
  • 秘密検索エンジン研究所
  • リサーチゲート
  • バルセロナ大学
このページをシェアする

抽象的な

Rhizostome Fish Forecasting Using Available Data: International Statistics and Hooks

Shiva Shankar

As climate change accelerates, biodiversity declines, and ecosystems change, it becomes increasingly difficult to capture dynamic populations, track changes, and predict responses to climate change. At the same time, publicly available databases and tools will increase access to science, foster collaboration, and generate more data than ever before. One of his most successful projects is his AI-driven Social His Network, which also serves as a public database designed to allow citizen scientists to accurately report their personal biodiversity accounts. It's his iNaturalist. INaturalist is particularly useful for studying rare, dangerous and charismatic organisms, but requires better integration into marine systems. Despite their abundance and ecological importance, fish species are difficult to manage due to the lack of long-term datasets with large numbers of samples. 8,412 data curated from both iNaturalist (n = 7,807) and published literature (n = 7,807) to provide a large sample size dataset and demonstrate the utility of publicly collected data We synthesized two global datasets of 10 fish species of the order Rhizostomeae, including points. 605) included). These reports were then used in combination with publicly available environmental data to predict global niche segmentation and distribution. The first niche model revealed that only 2 out of 10 genres have different niche areas. However, application of machine learning-based random forest models suggests species-specific differences in the association of abiotic environmental variables used to predict fish populations. Our approach of integrating reports from the literature with iNaturalist data helped us assess the quality of the models and, more importantly, the quality of the underlying data. We believe that freely accessible online data are valuable but subject to bias due to their limited taxonomic, geographic and ecological resolution. With underrepresented local experts, celebrities and enthusiasts who can implement locally coordinated projects and increase global participation to improve the resolution and meaning of the data. We encourage you to cooperate.

Keywords

Fish: Random forests model; Online databases; Citizen science; Naturalist; Cnidaria